Complete the User Survey by September 25
If you are a full-time contributor, please consider sharing your time, knowledge and experience to make our community more diverse and you’ll have the opportunity to meet new talents. Ask for further directions in #OpenStack-opw on Freenode.
Rob Hirschfeld, co-chair of the DefCore committee, shares more on DefCore, which defines capabilities, code and must-pass tests, creating the minimum standards for products labeled OpenStack
The Road to Tokyo
- Register now: full access registration prices increase on 9/29 at 11:59pm PT
- Discounted registration for nonprofit/government/students deadline is 9/25
- Get your OpenStack Summit Tokyo visa in five steps: Deadline for Visa invitation requests is 10/1
- The schedule and mobile app for the OpenStack Summit in Tokyo are now available
Reports from Previous Events
- None this week
Deadlines and Contributors Notifications
Security Advisories and Notices
- None this week
Tips ‘n Tricks
- By Nicole Martinelli: Confused about the OpenStack release cycle? Check out this handy chart
- By Superuser: How to migrate from VMware and Hyper-V to OpenStack
- By Madhu Kashyap: Bringing NFV into OpenStack with Tacker
- By Nicholas Cammorato: Building an OpenStack lab from scratch with PackStack on AWS and Google Cloud – Installing OpenStack via Packstack
- By Miguel Grinberg: Keystone-to-Keystone Federation with the OpenStack-Ansible Project
- Sep 21 – 24, 2015 Storage Developer Conference Santa Clara, CA, US
- Sep 29 – 30, 2015 Cloud Storage in OpenStack
- Oct 01, 2015 OpenStack Meetup Cluj Cluj-Napoc, Cluj, RO
- Oct 01, 2015 South Bay OpenStack Meetup, Beginner track San Francisco, CA, US
- Oct 01 – 02, 2015 October OpenStack Meetup – SDN and Containers Chicago, IL, US
- Oct 04 – 08, 2015 Gartner SymposiumITxpo Orlando, FL, US
- Oct 06, 2015 October Sydney Meetup
- Oct 07, 2015 Houston OpenStack Meetup Houston, TX, US
- Oct 07 – 08, 2015 OpenStack Liberty Release Richardson, TX, US
- Oct 07 – 08, 2015 OpenStack 101 Houston, TX, US
- Oct 10, 2015 OpenStack India Meetup, Pune Pune, IN
- Oct 12, 2015 OpenStack Cinder deep dive Stockholm, SE
- Oct 13, 2015 Pub Gathering Manchester, GB
- Oct 15, 2015 OpenStack Howto part 7 – Data Processing Prague, CZ
- Oct 15 – 16, 2015 Coming event, stay tuned Washington D.C., DC, US
- Oct 16, 2015 OpenStack PDX Meetup
- Oct 16, 2015 SFBay OpenStack Hackathon #OSSFO
What you need to know from the developer’s list
- PTL Nominations Are Over, Lets Start Elections!
- Five projects don’t have candidates. According to OpenStack governance, the TC will appoint the new PTL .
- Seven projects will have an election:
- There was confusion in UTC and how to submit nominations through Gerrit, but the TC will work with those candidates in Magnum, Barbican, Murano, Security.
- Doug Hellmann says MagnetoDB will be discussed for removal due to inactivity. 
- Proposed Priorities For Glance
- From conversations at the Ops Midcycle meetup and email threads with regards to Glance issues, Doug Hellmann put together a list of proposed priorities for the Glance team: Focus attention on DefCore:
- DefCore goals: Ensure all OpenStack deployments are interoperable at REST level (users can write software for one OpenStack cloud and move to another without changes to the code).
- Provide a well documented API with arguments that don’t change based on deployment choices.
- Integration tests in Tempest that test Glance’s API directly, in addition to the the current tests that proxy through Nova and Cinder.
- Once incorporated into DefCore, the APIs need to remain stable for an extended period of time, and follow deprecation timelines defined by complete V2 adoption in Nova and Cinder.
- In Nova, some specs didn’t land in Liberty. Both teams need to work together.
- In Cinder, the work is more complete, but needs to be reviewed that the API is used correctly.
- Security audits and bug fixes
- 5 out of the 18 recent security reports were related to Glance 
Two ways to upload images to Glance V2:
1) POST image bits to Glance API server.
- Not widely deployed. Potential DOS vector.
2) Task API, to have Glance download it asynchronously.
- Not widely deployed.
- Assumes you know what task “types” are supported by which cloud, and the expected arguments (i.e. JSON blob). (e.g. Glance docs give a url for a source, but Rackspace gives a Swift location as a source).
- New Proposed ‘default’ network model
- Monty hates floating IPs.
- Observed with 5 public clouds, requiring you to use a floating IP to get an outbound address. Others directly attach you to the public network.
- Some allow you to create a private network and attach virtual machines to it, create a router with a gateway.
- Monty wants an easier way to have a virtual machine on the external facing network of a cloud. Users shouldn’t have
- to learn about how to make that work with floating tips. This should be consistent behavior across public clouds. There is an effort set for Mitaka to work on Monty’s request . This will be done for ‘nova boot’ and work with multiple networks.
- If you have a more complicated network setup, this spec isn’t for you.
- Base Feature Deprecation Policy
- Thierry proposes a standard way to communicate and perform removal of user-visible behaviors and capabilities.
- We sort of have something today, but not written of “to remove a feature, you mark it deprecated for n releases, then remove it”.
- Tag proposed .
- We need to survey existing projects to see what their deprecation policy is.
- Proposed options for deprecation period:
- n+2 for features and capabilities, n+1 for config options
- n+1 for everything
- n+2 for everything
- Ben Swartzlander thinks this discussion also needs to cover long term support (LTS).
- Fungi thinks this is premature. Icehouse stable branch made it to 14 months before it was dropped due to not enough effort was given to keep it working.
- It was agreed “config options and features will have to be marked deprecated for a minimum of one stable release branch and a minimum of 3 months”.
- team:danger-not-diverse tag
- Josh Harlow is concerned that most projects start off small and not diverse, and this tag  would create negative connotations for those projects.
- Thierry raises it’s important to see the intent of the tag, rather by it’s name.
- The tag system is there to help our ecosystem navigate the big tent by providing bits of information.
- Example of information: how risky is it to invest on a given project?
- Some projects are dependent on a single company and can disappear in one day by the CEO’s decision.
- For this reason, Thierry supports describing project teams that are *extremely* fragile.
- As a result, the big tent is more inclusive. On the flip side, we need to inform our ecosystem that some project are less mature. Otherwise, you’re hiding this information.
- Using logstash.openstack.org and unit test logs to hunt down race conditions that are blocking the gate
Powered by WPeMatico